Black Temple Timewalking: Weapons Transmogrification Spotlight


Loading ....
 


Comment by fefenc

on 2017-07-15T14:59:01-05:00

Which warglaive version you like best?

Damn, can’t we have both? I’d use the classic pose for Havoc and the new one for Vengeance.

Blizzard used the PvP warglaive position as the new DH legendary mogs position in the character’s back. I’m actually enjoying this new pose because it looks dangerous, but I’d like to have the option to use the the old sheat aswell.

Comment by SnippZn

on 2017-07-15T15:05:22-05:00

It’s acutally not true that this is the first legendary look able to be used for transmog. The Legendary cloaks from Mists of pandaria can be used as transmog if you aquired those while they were available.

Comment by ONCHEhap

on 2017-07-15T15:10:00-05:00

I like the new pose better,the old one clipped ridiculously with shoulders while also being incredibly impractical

Comment by kaldriss

on 2017-07-15T15:12:48-05:00

It’s acutally not true that this is the first legendary look able to be used for transmog. The Legendary cloaks from Mists of pandaria can be used as transmog if you aquired those while they were available.

was clearly talking about legendary weapons mate

Comment by ore789

on 2017-07-15T15:19:45-05:00

Don’t know if im the only one but everyone seems to forget the old old look, that imo seems to be a better version of the “old” and the new look of the glaive
back sheet

Comment by Lostelf

on 2017-07-15T15:20:36-05:00

The new pose is way better.

Comment by SnippZn

on 2017-07-15T15:24:09-05:00

It’s acutally not true that this is the first legendary look able to be used for transmog. The Legendary cloaks from Mists of pandaria can be used as transmog if you aquired those while they were available.

was clearly talking about legendary weapons mate

Ah yes clearly. Except that’s not what it says ๐Ÿ™‚

Comment by lonesamurai1

on 2017-07-15T15:43:26-05:00

Actually now I’ve looked at both, I prefer the transmog glaives (the correct one) I hadn’t noticed til now the originals were backward

Comment by Maxisfree

on 2017-07-15T16:31:05-05:00

When I got my first warglaive a few years ago, I immediatly noticed they were backward on the back on my little character. It’s a god thing they finally change it after so many years. but heh, people don’t like when things change for logical reasons. This is how it should have looked like since the day the warglaives were released. Stop it with the nostalgia ppl pls

Comment by Skinpu

on 2017-07-15T17:47:06-05:00

If you like me and have bad luck and only gotten both the glaives on a character that can’t equip them you won’t have the achi and you’re @#$%ed

Comment by Happii

on 2017-07-15T18:47:14-05:00

There are ways they could have fixed the old iconic glaives while making it look usable, also the new glaives dose not look like the legion logo… http://i.imgur.com/DPiXOWx.png Notice the top half, There is also a large forum post to discuss the warglaive transmog and if its should be changed https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/20757617554?page=1

Comment by Melilithia

on 2017-07-15T19:07:31-05:00

Stop it with the nostalgia ppl pls

It’s not nostalgia for me… they just look incorrect; every other (DPS) Warglaive pair looks like the old shape.
Doesn’t make sense for the new ones to be backwards; people wanted the OLD glaive shape, so that’s what Blizzard should have done.

Comment by Tiralyon

on 2017-07-15T19:31:37-05:00

For the warglaives, give both to keep both sides happy. If they can’t do that, then change the sheath pose back to classic. New one does not resemble a legion logo. The warglaives in the new pose curve downward, whereas the legion logo points curve outward.(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEvKWTyV0AANhzW.jpg)

The new pose is a fidget spinner. –>http://imgur.com/a/QZqJT

All of this “we fixed an unintended look. New look is better” is a total pant load. If the original X sheath was unintended and a mistake the actual legendaries would have had their sheath changed 10 years ago. Not to mention every single warglaive has an X sheath pose, not a Y. Go back to the X pose, flip the glaives from back to front and the problem is solved.

Comment by monkiy

on 2017-07-15T20:39:50-05:00

Jesus, that new position looks awful, and as un-aesthetic as possible. No one asked for a new pose, only for them to be flipped. Blizz strikes again with “fixing” something that wasn’t broken.

Comment by Phlynch

on 2017-07-15T21:03:13-05:00

The new look looks like you could actually unsheathe them, the new position would take too long to get off your back and into a fighting stance.

Comment by kursyupool

on 2017-07-15T21:39:33-05:00

Sorry, but I do not represent the Legion, why would I want a Legion logo on my back when I am supposed to be FIGHTING them? I RP and this is unacceptable. Please change it back, there is no need to alter something that iconic unless you want to play with players emotions and frustrate them even more than they already are.

Comment by arc79

on 2017-07-15T22:05:47-05:00

First off, It does not look like the legion symbol. The legion symbol flares up at the tips, now down. They also may look “ok” on a Belf, but they are a mess on Night Elf males. I havent seen them on NElf females yet.

The “unintentional look” they wanted to fix was the handles facing out, but the way they fixed it was to change the look entirely. I am really disappointed in this and have no interest in mogging into these now. After waiting years for this, all I can say is, this was a very bad call on Blizz’ part. Id love to hear an actual Dev talk about this.

Comment by Chalice

on 2017-07-15T22:15:46-05:00

obviously the old one model.
the new one looks terrible

Comment by SciofSoA

on 2017-07-15T22:19:23-05:00

Survival hunters can use that two-handed axe, Soul Cleaver

Comment by zhake132

on 2017-07-15T23:12:32-05:00

It’s acutally not true that this is the first legendary look able to be used for transmog. The Legendary cloaks from Mists of pandaria can be used as transmog if you aquired those while they were available.

was clearly talking about legendary weapons mate

Ah yes clearly. Except that’s not what it says ๐Ÿ™‚

I’m sure the author expected people to have common sense and use the context of the article. ๐Ÿ™‚



Source link

 

From around the web