Classic WoW Dungeon Loot Tables on Wowhead’s Database



Comment by Nulgar

on 2019-06-01T02:40:16-05:00

Oh, the comment quality back then (see Cookie’s Allak/Thott comments) “killed him yesterday”, “I heard from a friend”, “there’s a, rumor that if you kill him naked” etc….

Comment by freddymabuse

on 2019-06-01T02:40:48-05:00

Hi,

nice work, but remember – not all items are avaluable at launch and in all Content-Phases.
For example Spellweaver’s Turban was added in patch 1.10 (https://itemization.info/item/22267)
So if you are really smart guys and girls you add a datafield/column for Content-Phases.

Comment by Dragunovka

on 2019-06-01T02:56:25-05:00

fix patch number in comments section.

Comment by perculia

on 2019-06-01T03:38:37-05:00

Hi,

nice work, but remember – not all items are avaluable at launch and in all Content-Phases.
For example Spellweaver’s Turban was added in patch 1.10 (https://itemization.info/item/22267)
So if you are really smart guys and girls you add a datafield/column for Content-Phases.

It’s not a bad idea, but this isn’t something we’ll be able to focus on currently; the Classic data does not come with what is in each phase so this would be a manual process, not through datamining or the Wowhead Client. We’re not even sure what all comes in each phase, the Classic Quest thread for example has people speculating when certain quests will be introduced. Ion’s tweet also references possibly some exceptions, so we’d like to learn more about those before we embark on such a project.

We may look into this at a later point, but our current focus is bringing the Classic database up to par with the BFA one (basic drops, filters, search) and then we might look into manually flagging things based on each phase, which first requires the devs to build a system showing what is in each phase.

Comment by perculia

on 2019-06-01T03:40:26-05:00

fix patch number in comments section.r
r
Not sure which comment this refers to, but you can send an example to and we’ll add it to our ticket backlog. However, our current focus is on fixing more database filters, improving search, and adding class ability ranks to the talent calculator, so it may not be top priority for us.

Comment by Asheeva

on 2019-06-01T04:17:18-05:00

Oh, the comment quality back then (see Cookie’s Allak/Thott comments) “killed him yesterday”, “I heard from a friend”, “there’s a, rumor that if you kill him naked” etc….r
r
Yeah, its kinda like a community isnt it? But lucky for us we dont have to deal with that anymore. Now we have elitist know it all pricks arguing about everything.

Comment by sycd

on 2019-06-01T05:13:30-05:00

Tinkerer Gizlock was found in Earth Song Falls in Classic. Only in Cataclysm was he moved to the Wicked Grotto.

Comment by makk3n

on 2019-06-01T07:02:36-05:00

fix patch number in comments section.r
r
Not sure which comment this refers to, but you can send an example to and we’ll add it to our ticket backlog. However, our current focus is on fixing more database filters, improving search, and adding class ability ranks to the talent calculator, so it may not be top priority for us.r
r
On the classic version of the site, all comments just show (Patch ?) for me. On the live version it shows patch number correctly, even for comments that exists on both versions.

Comment by Drorith

on 2019-06-01T07:13:38-05:00

This is fantastic, cheers for this! will come in handy!



Source link

 

Add Comment